Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether an intimation passed on an application for rectification under Section 84 of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 could be sustained without affording the petitioner a personal hearing.
Analysis: The challenge was confined to the absence of a personal hearing before passing the impugned intimation on the rectification application. Since the dispute was short and concerned the correctness of the reported turnover, the matter warranted an opportunity of hearing before the assessing authority took a decision on the rectification request.
Conclusion: The petitioner was entitled to be heard before orders were passed on the rectification application.
Final Conclusion: The matter was sent back to the assessing authority for a personal hearing and fresh orders, thereby protecting the petitioner's right to procedural fairness.
Ratio Decidendi: When a rectification request under the tax statute is decided, an affected party must be afforded a personal hearing where the circumstances show a dispute requiring consideration of factual correctness.