<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (8) TMI 1258 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299122</link>
    <description>An intimation on a rectification application under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act could not be sustained without first granting a personal hearing where the request involved a dispute on the correctness of reported turnover. The court held that, in such circumstances, procedural fairness required the assessing authority to hear the affected party before deciding the rectification request. The matter was therefore remitted for a personal hearing and fresh orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2021 18:40:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=662814" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (8) TMI 1258 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299122</link>
      <description>An intimation on a rectification application under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act could not be sustained without first granting a personal hearing where the request involved a dispute on the correctness of reported turnover. The court held that, in such circumstances, procedural fairness required the assessing authority to hear the affected party before deciding the rectification request. The matter was therefore remitted for a personal hearing and fresh orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299122</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>