Interim bail in corruption case granted with strict safeguards where documentary evidence and low tampering risk supported release.

Interim bail was granted on a successive bail application in a criminal and corruption matter after the Court weighed the filed charge-sheet, continuing further investigation, the largely documentary nature of the evidence, the custody already undergone, and the limited risk of tampering with bank-seized documents. It applied the principle that bail is the rule and jail is the exception, while safeguarding the investigation and trial through strict conditions. The applicant's undertaking on disclosure and non-alienation of properties also supported release for a limited period, but regular bail was not granted at that stage.

---

---

Issues: Whether the applicant, facing a successive bail application in a case under the criminal law and corruption law, should be enlarged on interim bail pending further investigation.

Analysis: The application was considered in the backdrop of a filed charge-sheet, continuing further investigation, the largely documentary nature of the material, the custody period already undergone, and the limited likelihood of tampering with seized documents kept with banks. The Court balanced the need to preserve the investigative process against the constitutional value of personal liberty and the principle that bail is the rule and jail is the exception. It also took note of the undertaking regarding disclosure and non-alienation of properties and imposed stringent safeguards to protect the investigation and trial.

Conclusion: Interim bail was granted for a limited period with strict conditions, instead of regular bail at that stage.

---