Bail order clarified to cover both brothers, allowing participation in insolvency resolution proceedings with prior intimation to investigators.

An earlier bail order was clarified to remove ambiguity and expressly cover both brothers, allowing them to participate in the corporate insolvency resolution process. The court treated the request as a technical correction because the earlier order had already referred to both brothers in more than one place, and it accepted that the Resolution Professional needed to continue the process without obstruction. The investigating agency raised no objection. Participation in meetings and proceedings before the Resolution Professional remained subject to the earlier condition requiring intimation to the Investigating Officer.

---

---

Issues: Whether the earlier bail order required modification and clarification so that the name of the second brother was expressly covered and both brothers could participate in the insolvency resolution proceedings.

Analysis: The earlier order had already referred to both brothers at more than one place, and the present request was treated as a technical correction to remove ambiguity. The Court noted that the Resolution Professional was acting in the course of the corporate insolvency resolution process, that the object was to enable the process to continue without obstruction, and that the investigating agency had no objection. The Court also clarified that the participation of both brothers in meetings or proceedings to be conducted by the Resolution Professional would continue in accordance with the earlier condition requiring intimation to the Investigating Officer.

Conclusion: The application for modification and clarification was allowed, and the order was clarified so that both brothers stood covered and could participate in the insolvency resolution process as directed.

---