Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the charge-sheet filed by the police could be treated as a complete police report under Section 173(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, and whether the petitioner was entitled to default bail under Section 167(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
Analysis: The statutory scheme balances personal liberty with the need for investigation by requiring completion of investigation without unnecessary delay and by permitting default bail when the prescribed period expires. A police report need not be rejected merely because further investigation is stated to be continuing, if the material already placed is sufficient for the Magistrate to take cognizance. At the same time, a report that on its face discloses that investigation into the substratum of the offence is still incomplete, and is filed at the end of the statutory period to defeat the accused's right to bail, cannot be treated as a completed final report. On the facts, the report itself recorded that further investigation was still in progress even against the arrested accused, and the investigation into the petitioner's role in the alleged larger conspiracy had not concluded.
Conclusion: The charge-sheet was not treated as a completed police report for the purpose of defeating the petitioner's right under Section 167(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, and the petitioner was held entitled to default bail.