High Court of Bombay RERA Appellate Authority failure on unregistered projects addressed The High Court of Bombay addressed the failure of the MahaRERA Appellate Authority to consider complaints related to unregistered projects under the RERA ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
High Court of Bombay RERA Appellate Authority failure on unregistered projects addressed
The High Court of Bombay addressed the failure of the MahaRERA Appellate Authority to consider complaints related to unregistered projects under the RERA Act. The Respondent assured the court that necessary modifications to the online software system would be completed within 15 days to enable the acceptance of complaints for unregistered projects. Once upgraded, complainants could register their complaints online, which would be processed following the standard procedure for registered projects. The court declared the grievance raised in the petition as addressed, and the Writ Petition was disposed of accordingly.
Issues: Failure of MahaRERA Appellate Authority to address complaints regarding unregistered projects.
Analysis: The High Court of Bombay, comprising R.M. Borde and V.M. Deshpande, JJ., heard a petition concerning the failure of the MahaRERA Appellate Authority to consider complaints related to unregistered projects. The Petitioner raised concerns about the Appellate Authority's lack of action on complaints regarding unregistered projects under the RERA Act. The Respondent's counsel acknowledged the issue and informed the court that the online software system was not currently capable of handling complaints for unregistered projects. It was assured that necessary modifications to the software would be completed within 15 days to enable the acceptance of complaints for unregistered projects by MahaRERA. Once the software is upgraded, the Petitioner and other complainants in similar situations would be allowed to register their complaints online following the prescribed procedure. The complaints for unregistered projects would be processed in accordance with the standard procedure applied to registered projects. This assurance was provided by the Respondent's counsel based on instructions from Mr. Wani, the Administrative officer of MahaRERA, who was present in court. Consequently, the court declared that the grievance raised in the petition had been addressed, and the Writ Petition was disposed of accordingly.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
