Tribunal reinstates assessment order under sec 143(3), rejects CIT's sec 263 order.

The Tribunal set aside the order of the ld. CIT issued under section 263 of the Act, reinstating the assessment order framed under section 143(3) of the Act. The Tribunal found that the appellant's assessment was not erroneous or prejudicial to the revenue's interest. It concluded that the jurisdiction assumed under section 263 was legally flawed, considering the history of approval for deduction u/s 80IB and the absence of a requirement for SSI Unit registration. The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the Assessee, rejecting the alleged errors in the assessment order.

---

---

Issues: Validity of order u/s. 263 of the Act

Analysis:
1. The appellant challenged the validity of the order of the ld.CIT, Raipur dated 18.03.2014 framed u/s. 263 of the Act, arguing that the assessment order dated 23.12.2011 under section 143(3) of the Act was neither erroneous nor prejudicial to the interest of the revenue.
2. The Tribunal carefully considered the submissions and reviewed the documentary evidences in light of Rule 18(6) of the ITAT Rules.
3. The ld. CIT issued a notice dated 22.01.2014 under section 263, pointing out alleged errors in the assessment order, including the disallowance of deduction u/s 80IB and the failure to offer interest income for taxation.
4. The Tribunal noted that the audit report, although not initially submitted, was made available during the proceedings u/s. 263. Citing precedents, it held that the audit report could be filed at the appellate stage.
5. The Tribunal referred to a case where a similar issue of deduction u/s 80IB was considered, and since the audit report was submitted before the ld. CIT, adverse inference was not drawn.
6. Notably, the deduction u/s 80IB was claimed for the tenth year, indicating previous approval by the Assessing Officer for nine years, leading the Tribunal to conclude that the assumption of jurisdiction u/s. 263 was legally flawed.
7. Regarding the allegation of the appellant not being registered as an SSI Unit, the Tribunal found no such requirement under section 80IB(14) clause G, thereby rejecting the claim of error in the assessment order.
8. The Tribunal also addressed the issue of interest on IT refund, noting that the appellant had credited the interest amount to the interest account, eliminating the possibility of under assessment.
9. After considering all aspects of the case, the Tribunal set aside the ld. CIT's order and reinstated the assessment order framed u/s. 143(3) of the Act, ultimately allowing the appeal filed by the Assessee.

---