Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the non-bailable warrants issued against the petitioners should be converted into bailable warrants pending the decision of the Supreme Court on the underlying legal controversy.
Analysis: The prayer for conversion of the warrants was considered maintainable even though the later order dated 15.3.2018 was not separately challenged, because the warrant order flowed from and was consequential to the cognizance order dated 12.3.2018. The petitioners had already been enlarged on bail in the predicate offences and had been regularly appearing before the trial court without misuse of liberty. The existence of the non-bailable warrants was dependent on the subsistence of the cognizance order, and the matter was being kept in abeyance awaiting authoritative pronouncement by the Supreme Court. In these circumstances, and applying the principle that non-bailable warrants should be used only when summons or bailable warrants are unlikely to secure appearance, the petitioners were not to be placed at a disadvantage pending final determination.
Conclusion: The objection to the prayer was rejected and the non-bailable warrants were directed to be converted into bailable warrants. The main petition was kept pending and listed after the Supreme Court's decision.