https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298018 A challenge to non-bailable warrants was treated as maintainable because the warrant order was consequential to the cognizance order. The court noted that the petitioners were already on bail in the predicate offences and had been regularly appearing before the trial court without misuse of liberty. Applying the principle that non-bailable warrants should issue only when summons or bailable warrants are unlikely to secure appearance, the court found no basis to place the petitioners at a disadvantage while the underlying legal controversy remained pending before the Supreme Court. The non-bailable warrants were therefore converted into bailable warrants, and the main petition was kept pending. en-us Wed, 09 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 05 Oct 2021 20:03:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298018 A challenge to non-bailable warrants was treated as maintainable because the warrant order was consequential to the cognizance order. The court noted that the petitioners were already on bail in the predicate offences and had been regularly appearing before the trial court without misuse of liberty. Applying the principle that non-bailable warrants should issue only when summons or bailable warrants are unlikely to secure appearance, the court found no basis to place the petitioners at a disadvantage while the underlying legal controversy remained pending before the Supreme Court. The non-bailable warrants were therefore converted into bailable warrants, and the main petition was kept pending. Case-Laws Money Laundering Wed, 09 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298018