Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether an application under Section 95(1) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 for initiation of the insolvency resolution process against a personal guarantor could be entertained and, pending examination, whether a resolution professional could be appointed.
Analysis: The application was supported by the loan documents, personal guarantee, default particulars, prior filing of claim before the interim resolution professional of the corporate debtor, and service of the statutory notice in Form B. On filing of the application, the interim moratorium under Section 96(1)(a) came into operation. The proposed insolvency professional had accepted appointment and stated that no disciplinary proceedings were pending. The statutory scheme under Sections 97 and 99 was attracted for appointment of a resolution professional to examine the application and submit a report with reasons for acceptance or rejection.
Outcome: The application was taken on record, interim moratorium operated, and Mr. Amit Ojha was appointed as resolution professional for further examination under Section 99.