Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Court grants exemptions, issues notices, and sets deadlines in criminal matters The Court allowed the exemption applications in CRL.M.A.8478/2021 & CRL.M.A.8480/2021 subject to all just exceptions and disposed of the applications. ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Court grants exemptions, issues notices, and sets deadlines in criminal matters
The Court allowed the exemption applications in CRL.M.A.8478/2021 & CRL.M.A.8480/2021 subject to all just exceptions and disposed of the applications. In W.P.(CRL) 1051/2021 & CRL.M.A. 8479/2021, W.P.(CRL) 1052/2021 & CRL.M.A. 8481/2021, notices were issued, and respondents were given time to file counter-affidavits. The Court directed respondents to submit necessary documents within four weeks and allowed a rejoinder within two weeks thereafter. No coercive steps were to be taken against petitioners pending further orders, but cooperation with investigations was mandated. Custodial interrogation required permission from the Court with reasons provided by the investigating agency.
Exemption Applications (CRL.M.A.8478/2021 & CRL.M.A.8480/2021): The Court allowed the exemption applications subject to all just exceptions, and subsequently disposed of the applications.
Notice Issuance and Counter-Affidavit Filing (W.P.(CRL) 1051/2021 & CRL.M.A. 8479/2021, W.P.(CRL) 1052/2021 & CRL.M.A. 8481/2021): The Court issued notices in the mentioned cases. Both respondent No.1 and respondent No.2 accepted the notice and requested time to file a counter-affidavit. The Court directed the respondents to file the necessary documents within four weeks with an advance copy to the other party. Any rejoinder to be filed within two weeks thereafter. The matter was set for further hearing on a specified date. The Court ordered that no coercive steps should be taken against the petitioners until further orders, but they must cooperate with the investigation when required. The Court clarified that if custodial interrogation is deemed necessary by the investigating agency, they must provide reasons and seek permission from the Court.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.