<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (5) TMI 986 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296804</link>
    <description>The Court allowed the exemption applications in CRL.M.A.8478/2021 &amp;amp; CRL.M.A.8480/2021 subject to all just exceptions and disposed of the applications. In W.P.(CRL) 1051/2021 &amp;amp; CRL.M.A. 8479/2021, W.P.(CRL) 1052/2021 &amp;amp; CRL.M.A. 8481/2021, notices were issued, and respondents were given time to file counter-affidavits. The Court directed respondents to submit necessary documents within four weeks and allowed a rejoinder within two weeks thereafter. No coercive steps were to be taken against petitioners pending further orders, but cooperation with investigations was mandated. Custodial interrogation required permission from the Court with reasons provided by the investigating agency.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Aug 2021 08:49:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=651905" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (5) TMI 986 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296804</link>
      <description>The Court allowed the exemption applications in CRL.M.A.8478/2021 &amp;amp; CRL.M.A.8480/2021 subject to all just exceptions and disposed of the applications. In W.P.(CRL) 1051/2021 &amp;amp; CRL.M.A. 8479/2021, W.P.(CRL) 1052/2021 &amp;amp; CRL.M.A. 8481/2021, notices were issued, and respondents were given time to file counter-affidavits. The Court directed respondents to submit necessary documents within four weeks and allowed a rejoinder within two weeks thereafter. No coercive steps were to be taken against petitioners pending further orders, but cooperation with investigations was mandated. Custodial interrogation required permission from the Court with reasons provided by the investigating agency.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296804</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>