Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a society registered under the A.P. (Telangana Area) Public Societies Registration Act 1350 Fasli could be treated as eligible under the tender condition requiring registration under the earlier societies registration enactments.
Analysis: Section 32(1) of the A.P. Societies Registration Act, 2001 repealed the Societies Registration Act 1860 and the A.P. (Telangana Area) Public Societies Registration Act 1350 Fasli. Section 32(2) preserved actions taken under the repealed enactments by deeming them to have been taken under the 2001 Act as if that Act had been in force on the relevant date. In view of this deeming provision, a society already registered under the 1350 Fasli Act was to be treated as registered under the 2001 Act. The tender rejection on the footing that the petitioner was not registered under the eligible enactments was therefore inconsistent with the statutory scheme.
Conclusion: The petitioner's registration under the 1350 Fasli Act was deemed to be registration under the 2001 Act, and the rejection of its tender as invalid was illegal.