<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (11) TMI 853 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296713</link>
    <description>A society registered under the A.P. (Telangana Area) Public Societies Registration Act, 1350 Fasli was treated as registered under the A.P. Societies Registration Act, 2001 because Section 32(2) deemed actions under the repealed enactments to have been taken under the 2001 Act. The repeal in Section 32(1) of the earlier societies laws did not deprive an already registered society of its registration status. On that basis, a tender condition requiring registration under the earlier enactments could not lawfully exclude the petitioner, and rejection of its tender as not validly registered was inconsistent with the statutory scheme.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 05 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2021 13:27:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=651579" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (11) TMI 853 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296713</link>
      <description>A society registered under the A.P. (Telangana Area) Public Societies Registration Act, 1350 Fasli was treated as registered under the A.P. Societies Registration Act, 2001 because Section 32(2) deemed actions under the repealed enactments to have been taken under the 2001 Act. The repeal in Section 32(1) of the earlier societies laws did not deprive an already registered society of its registration status. On that basis, a tender condition requiring registration under the earlier enactments could not lawfully exclude the petitioner, and rejection of its tender as not validly registered was inconsistent with the statutory scheme.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 05 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=296713</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>