Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        1981 (6) TMI 24 - HC - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal Upholds Income-tax Act Section 263(1) - Depreciation Errors Corrected The Tribunal upheld the Additional Commissioner's invocation of Section 263(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, finding the Income-tax Officer's orders ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Tribunal Upholds Income-tax Act Section 263(1) - Depreciation Errors Corrected

                          The Tribunal upheld the Additional Commissioner's invocation of Section 263(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, finding the Income-tax Officer's orders erroneous and prejudicial to revenue due to incorrect depreciation calculation. It ruled that depreciation and written down value for fixed assets of a sterling company must be determined in Indian rupees, not sterling, as assets used in India should be assessed in rupees. The Tribunal affirmed the necessity of assessing income and allowances in Indian currency, supporting the Commissioner's actions and rejecting the company's sterling-based accounting method.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Legality of invoking Section 263(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 by the Additional Commissioner of Income-tax.
                          2. Determination of the written down value of fixed assets for a sterling company maintaining accounts in pound sterling.

                          Detailed Analysis:

                          Issue 1: Legality of Invoking Section 263(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961

                          The Tribunal held that the Additional Commissioner of Income-tax legally invoked the provisions of Section 263(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Additional Commissioner initiated proceedings under Section 263 because the orders passed by the Income-tax Officer (ITO) were erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of the revenue. The ITO had allowed excessive depreciation to the assessee by converting the sterling value of assets into rupees using an incorrect exchange rate, resulting in an under-assessment of income for the years 1967-68 to 1970-71.

                          The Additional Commissioner observed that the ITO should have computed the depreciation based on the rupee cost of the assets, as the assets were located and used in India. The depreciation allowance should be determined in terms of rupees, and the cost of the assets should not change with fluctuations in the exchange rate. The Tribunal upheld this view, stating that the orders of the ITO were indeed erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of the revenue, thus justifying the invocation of Section 263(1).

                          Issue 2: Determination of the Written Down Value of Fixed Assets

                          The Tribunal considered the method of determining the written down value (WDV) of fixed assets for a sterling company maintaining accounts in pound sterling. The assessee argued that the WDV should be determined based on the sterling value of the assets and then converted into rupees using the exchange rate at the end of the year, as per Rule 115 of the Income-tax Rules, 1962. The assessee maintained that this method was consistent with the commercial principles and the regular method of accounting followed by the company.

                          However, the Additional Commissioner and the Tribunal disagreed with this approach. They held that the actual cost of the assets should be determined in terms of rupees, as the assets were used in India. The depreciation should be computed on the rupee cost of the assets, and the WDV should be calculated accordingly. The Tribunal referred to the decision of the Calcutta High Court in Riverside (Bhatpara) Electric Supply Co. Ltd. v. CIT, which supported the view that the actual cost and WDV should be determined based on the rupee value of the assets at the time of their acquisition.

                          The Tribunal also noted that the Income-tax Act required the determination of allowances and income in terms of Indian currency. Sections such as 10, 10B, 43(1), and 43(6) of the Act, along with Rule 115, supported the view that the assessment should be made in Indian rupees. The Tribunal concluded that the method of accounting in sterling did not affect the requirement to compute depreciation and WDV in rupees for the purpose of Indian income tax.

                          Conclusion:

                          The Tribunal affirmed the legality of invoking Section 263(1) by the Additional Commissioner and upheld the determination of the WDV of fixed assets in rupees, rejecting the assessee's method of accounting in sterling. Both questions referred to the court were answered in the affirmative and in favor of the revenue.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found