Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 was barred by limitation on the ground that the default occurred in 2013.
Analysis: The account of the corporate debtor was classified as NPA on 17 June 2013. The application under Section 7 was filed on 1 April 2019. The applicable limitation period for such an is three years under Article 137 of the Limitation Act, and it runs from the date of default, which in the present case was the date of NPA classification. On that basis, the application was beyond limitation and could not validly trigger CIRP.
Conclusion: The application under Section 7 was barred by limitation and the admission order could not be sustained. The appeal succeeded and the impugned order was set aside.
Ratio Decidendi: An application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 must be filed within the three-year limitation period under Article 137 of the Limitation Act, computed from the date of default, ordinarily reflected by the date of NPA classification.