Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the applicant was entitled to anticipatory bail after filing of the charge-sheet in the absence of direct evidence against him.
Analysis: The application was under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. The charge-sheet had already been filed, and the Court noted that there was no direct evidence against the applicant. In these circumstances, the Court found it to extend the protection of anticipatory bail, while imposing conditions to secure the trial and ensure cooperation with the proceedings.
Conclusion: Anticipatory bail was granted to the applicant on furnishing the specified bond and surety, subject to the stated conditions.
Ratio Decidendi: Filing of the charge-sheet and absence of direct evidence may justify grant of anticipatory bail, subject to appropriate conditions securing the trial.