Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the order of the Tribunal suffered from a mistake apparent on the face of the record in treating the balance capital gain as non-existent after allowing exemption under section 54, and whether the question of the period from which indexation benefit was to be granted required adjudication.
Analysis: The assessee's rectification plea was examined in the context of computation of long-term capital gain. The Tribunal accepted that, even after allowing exemption under section 54, some taxable long-term capital gain would still remain. On that basis, the earlier observation that no capital gain survived for taxation was found to be erroneous for rectification purposes. The issue relating to adoption of guideline value under section 50C was not pursued further and was not taken up for adjudication.
Conclusion: The order was recalled to the limited extent necessary for examining the period from which indexation benefit should be allowed while computing long-term capital gain.