Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2020 (8) TMI 846

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... R. Premi, Jt. CIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru. ORDER Per N.V. Vasudevan, Vice President This is a miscellaneous petition [MP] filed by the assessee u/s. 254(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 [the Act] praying that the order of Tribunal dated 30.11.2019 suffers from a mistake apparent on the face of record and should be rectified. 2. The issue that arose for consideration in the aforesaid appea....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e other two issues referred to above academic and are not being adjudicated. 4. In this MP, the assessee has pointed out that even after allowing deduction u/s. 54 of the Act, there would still be long term capital gain that would be chargeable to tax and therefore adjudication of the other two issues would also be vital. It was submitted that the order of Tribunal suffers from a mistake appare....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ed the submissions of the ld. counsel for the assessee and are of the view that there is a mistake apparent on the face of record inasmuch as even after allowing deduction u/s 54 of the Act, there would still be long term capital gain that would be chargeable to tax and therefore the question of period from which indexation benefit should be allowed to the assessee ought to have been adjudicated. ....