Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee's flats could be treated as one self occupied house property and whether the additions made by treating them as deemed let out properties and estimating notional rental income required reconsideration in light of additional evidence.
Analysis: The dispute concerned the application of section 23 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 to multiple residential units held by the assessee. The record also contained additional evidence in the form of an order in the case of a co-owner relating to the same flats, where the units had been treated as one house property. The Tribunal found that this evidence had not been placed before the authorities below and considered it appropriate that the Assessing Officer examine it. It further held that the assessee was not barred by any estoppel from offering the property as self occupied and deemed let out in a different manner, and that the tax planning adopted could not be said to be a colourable device.
Conclusion: The issue was remitted to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration after taking the additional evidence into account. The assessee obtained partial relief.