TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Join Channel
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether a person against whom a detention order has been passed but not yet served can invoke Section 11 of the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 at the pre-detention stage and obtain a restraint against execution of the order pending disposal of the revocation request. (ii) Whether the later adjudication order could require reconsideration of the revocation request on the footing that the detention order fell within the third exception recognised for pre-execution challenge.
Issue (i): Whether a person against whom a detention order has been passed but not yet served can invoke Section 11 of the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 at the pre-detention stage and obtain a restraint against execution of the order pending disposal of the revocation request.
Analysis: The words "at any time" in Section 11 were construed to mean any time after the passing of the detention order, including before service. The right to seek revocation at the pre-detention stage was treated as flowing from Article 21 of the Constitution of India. However, the Court distinguished that limited right from any further right to insist that the detention order should not be executed until the revocation application is decided. The earlier Bombay view was held to be overruled to the extent it recognised such a restraint, and the later Supreme Court decision was read as not enlarging the pre-execution remedy beyond the recognised exceptional categories.
Conclusion: The person could invoke Section 11 before service of the detention order, but was not entitled to an injunction preventing execution pending disposal of the revocation application.
Issue (ii): Whether the later adjudication order could require reconsideration of the revocation request on the footing that the detention order fell within the third exception recognised for pre-execution challenge.
Analysis: The authority dealing with a Section 11 application was bound to consider a contention that the detention order fell within one of the recognised pre-execution exceptions, including the allegation that it was for a wrong purpose. The Court further held that the authority had to apply its mind to the material and record reasons in the file, even though those reasons need not be communicated. On examination of the file, the Court found that the petitioner's contention based on the adjudication order and alleged absence of smuggling had not been considered from the relevant legal angle. The Court therefore remitted the revocation application for fresh consideration without expressing any view on the merits of the adjudication order itself.
Conclusion: The impugned refusal to revoke was quashed and the Section 11 application was remitted for fresh disposal in accordance with law.
Final Conclusion: The writ petition succeeded only to the limited extent of requiring fresh consideration of the revocation request, while the petitioner was denied any interim protection against execution of the detention order.
Ratio Decidendi: Section 11 of COFEPOSA permits a pre-detention request for revocation after the detention order is made, but it does not confer a right to prevent execution of the order pending that request; where a revocation plea invokes a recognised pre-execution exception, the authority must consider it on the relevant material and record reasons in its file.
TaxTMI 
