TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Liquidator lacks property rights; Rule discharged on proceeds distribution. Opponent awarded costs & hearing fee.</h1> <h3>Amrita Lal Kundu Versus Anukul Chandra Das</h3> Amrita Lal Kundu Versus Anukul Chandra Das - TMI The High Court of Calcutta discharged the Rule regarding the distribution of proceeds in Court, stating that the liquidator of a company does not have vested property rights. The opposite party was awarded costs and a hearing fee of one gold mohur. (Case citation: 1915 (8) TMI 2 - High Court of Calcutta)
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
