Liquidator lacks property rights; Rule discharged on proceeds distribution. Opponent awarded costs & hearing fee. The High Court of Calcutta discharged the Rule on the distribution of proceeds in Court, holding that a company's liquidator does not possess vested ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
The High Court of Calcutta discharged the Rule on the distribution of proceeds in Court, holding that a company's liquidator does not possess vested property rights. The opposing party was granted costs and a hearing fee of one gold mohur.
The High Court of Calcutta discharged the Rule regarding the distribution of proceeds in Court, stating that the liquidator of a company does not have vested property rights. The opposite party was awarded costs and a hearing fee of one gold mohur. (Case citation: 1915 (8) TMI 2 - High Court of Calcutta)
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.