Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the difference between the actual rent paid by an employee and 10 per cent of salary can, in every case, be treated as a perquisite for the purpose of deduction of income-tax at source.
Analysis: Section 17(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 brings within the meaning of perquisite the value of any concession in the matter of rent respecting accommodation provided by the employer. The decisive question is whether the employee in fact receives a concession in rent, which depends on the normal rent of the accommodation and the rent actually paid. Rule 3 of the Income-tax Rules, 1962 is only a valuation rule operating after a perquisite is otherwise established; it does not create a deeming fiction that every case where rent is below 10 per cent of salary is necessarily a concessional-rent case. To construe the rule otherwise would extend beyond the rule-making power under Section 295(2)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Conclusion: The blanket treatment of the difference between actual rent and 10 per cent of salary as a perquisite was unlawful and the issue is answered in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: A perquisite arises from an actual concession in rent, and valuation rules cannot be used to deem the existence of that concession in the absence of such factual foundation.