Karnataka High Court quashes invalid income tax notice under Section 148 for business expenditure.

The High Court of Karnataka ruled in favor of the income-tax assessee, quashing the notice issued under section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 1968-69. The court held that the notice was not valid as the business had commenced after the expenditure in question was incurred, aligning with precedents that allow business expenditure incurred before business commencement if attributable to the business. The court referenced relevant case law and ordered the notice to be quashed without costs awarded to either party.

---

---

Issues involved: Challenge to the legality of notice issued u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for assessment year 1968-69.

Summary:
The High Court of Karnataka, in the case presented by an income-tax assessee, addressed the legality of a notice issued u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for the assessment year 1968-69. The notice was issued on the grounds that certain income had escaped assessment. The respondent argued that the notice was based on the allowance of certain expenditure incurred before the commencement of the business. However, the petitioner contended that the initiation of action u/s 147(a) was not valid as the business commenced only on January 26, 1968, and the expenditure was allowed even prior to that date. The petitioner relied on the decision of the Supreme Court in Gemini Leather Stores v. ITO [1975] 100 ITR 1 to support their argument. Additionally, referencing the case of C. T. Desai v. CIT [1979] 120 ITR 240, it was highlighted that business expenditure incurred before the commencement of the business, but attributable to the business, was considered allowable. Consequently, the High Court ruled in favor of the petitioner, quashing the impugned notice dated July 24, 1975, as it was not valid even on merits. The court made the order that the rule be made absolute, the notice be quashed, and no costs be awarded.

---