Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Rule 6(1) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002/2004 applied to require reversal of Cenvat credit in respect of inputs when the assessee's final products became exempt from excise duty from 1-8-2004.
Analysis: The assessee had already been granted reversal of Cenvat credit on 1-8-2004, and on that date the final product was not yet exempted. The cases were held to be covered by the earlier decision in Collector of Central Excise, Pune v. Dai Ichi Karkaria Ltd., which governed the treatment of such credit. On that footing, Rule 6(1) could not be invoked against the assessee in the facts of the case.
Conclusion: Rule 6(1) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002/2004 was held inapplicable, and the assessee succeeded.