TaxTMI Login
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Just a moment...
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Section 350(a) of the Code of Criminal Procedure applies to proceedings in a warrant case before charge is framed, and whether such proceedings at that stage are an enquiry rather than a trial.
Analysis: The proceeding before framing of charge in a warrant case was treated as an enquiry and not as a trial. Existing authorities supported that view, including decisions regarded as settled and consistent, and there was no reason to depart from them. On that basis, there was no legal objection to the Magistrate's order.
Conclusion: Section 350(a) could be applied at the pre-charge stage in a warrant case because the proceeding was an enquiry and not a trial. The revision was therefore dismissed.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
