Section 50 not required for bag recovery; voluntary Section 67 statement and intact seals sustained the conviction.

Possession of narcotic drugs from a shoulder bag did not attract Section 50 notice requirements because the recovery was not from personal search. The Section 67 statement was treated as voluntary and corroborative, and the belated retraction was rejected as an afterthought. The absence of public witnesses did not undermine the prosecution where the official evidence was found trustworthy, and minor discrepancies in timings, seal handling, and register entries were held insufficient to dislodge the case. The Court also accepted that the contraband and samples remained properly sealed and intact, and the conviction and sentence were upheld.

---

---

Issues: Whether the conviction and sentence for possession of narcotic drugs under Section 21(c) of the NDPS Act called for interference in appeal.

Analysis: The recovery was from the appellant's shoulder bag and not from his personal search, so the requirement of notice under Section 50 was not essential. The statement recorded under Section 67 was treated as voluntary and corroborative, while the retraction was held to be belated and an afterthought. Non-examination of public witnesses did not vitiate the prosecution because conviction can rest on trustworthy official testimony. The discrepancies regarding timings, seal handling, and register entries were treated as minor and not sufficient to dislodge the prosecution case. The Court found the contraband and samples had remained properly sealed and intact.

Conclusion: The conviction and sentence were upheld and the appeal was dismissed.

---