Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2016 (3) TMI 1385 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal grants 10% additional depreciation & upholds capital gains based on joint venture agreement The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to allow the balance 10% additional depreciation for the year under consideration. ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Tribunal grants 10% additional depreciation & upholds capital gains based on joint venture agreement

                          The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to allow the balance 10% additional depreciation for the year under consideration. The computation of capital gains based on a joint venture agreement was upheld for the same year.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Disallowance of 50% of additional depreciation claim.
                          2. Computation of capital gains.

                          Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Disallowance of 50% of Additional Depreciation Claim:

                          The first issue pertains to the disallowance of 50% of the additional depreciation claimed by the assessee for the assessment year 2010-11. The assessee had claimed 50% of the additional depreciation in the previous year (2009-10) because the machinery was used for less than six months, and the remaining 10% was claimed in the current year. The Assessing Officer disallowed this claim, stating that there is no provision in the Income-tax Act, 1961, for allowing the balance 10% of the additional depreciation in the subsequent year. The CIT(A) upheld this disallowance.

                          The assessee's counsel argued that the Cochin Bench in the case of Apollo Tyres Ltd vs. ACIT (2014) 64 SOT 203 had allowed the balance additional depreciation in the subsequent year. The Departmental Representative contended that Section 32(1)(iia) of the Act does not provide for the carry forward of additional depreciation.

                          Upon reviewing the submissions and the material on record, the Tribunal noted that the Cochin Bench had previously held that additional depreciation could be allowed in the next year if it could not be fully allowed in the earlier year. The Tribunal cited similar decisions from the Delhi Bench in Cosmo Films Ltd and SIL Investment Ltd, and the Mumbai Bench in MITC Rolling Mills (P.) Ltd., which supported the allowance of the balance 50% additional depreciation in the subsequent year. Consequently, the Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to allow the balance 10% additional depreciation for the year under consideration, setting aside the orders of the lower authorities.

                          2. Computation of Capital Gains:

                          The second issue concerns the computation of long-term capital gains based on a joint venture agreement dated 7.9.2009. The Assessing Officer computed the gains at Rs. 86,45,99,912/-. The assessee argued that the joint venture agreement and the power of attorney would be effective only after receiving the necessary construction approvals from the concerned authorities, which had not been received during the year under consideration. Therefore, there was no transfer of interest in the immovable property.

                          The Departmental Representative countered that the agreement between the assessee and the developer (M/s Godrej Properties Ltd) involved the development of land, with the assessee entitled to 30% of the constructed area and the developer receiving 70% of the undivided share in the property. The physical possession of the property was handed over to the developer, constituting a transfer under Section 2(47) of the Act, which includes any arrangement enabling the enjoyment of the property.

                          The Tribunal reviewed the agreement and found that the assessee had granted irrevocable rights to the developer for the development and sale of the property, effectively transferring 70% of the undivided share in the land in exchange for 30% of the constructed area. This arrangement, although not a transfer under common law, constituted a transfer under Section 2(47)(vi) of the Act, enabling the developer to enjoy or sell the property. Therefore, the Tribunal concluded that the capital gains had to be assessed during the year under consideration and upheld the CIT(A)'s order.

                          Conclusion:

                          The appeal of the assessee was partly allowed. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to allow the balance 10% additional depreciation for the year under consideration, while upholding the computation of capital gains for the same year. The order was pronounced in the open court on 4th March 2016, at Chennai.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found