Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the Tribunal was justified in holding that only one-half of the property passed on the death of Mohanlal. (ii) Whether Smt. Kessarbai was entitled to one-half share at the moment of Mohanlal's death.
Issue (i): The determination turned on the share in the joint Hindu family estate that actually belonged to the deceased at the time of death. The Court applied the earlier Full Bench ruling that, where the wife had an interest accruing to her on partition under the Hindu Succession Act, the estate passing on death is limited to the deceased's own share and not the whole of the property standing in his name.
Conclusion: The Tribunal was not justified in holding that one-half of the property passed on the death of Mohanlal. Two-thirds of the property held by him passed on his death.
Issue (ii): On the facts, the deceased, his son, and his wife constituted the joint Hindu family, and the wife's share had to be worked out in the joint family estate. The Court held that the Tribunal's one-half computation was inconsistent with the governing Full Bench decision and the wife's share had to be recognised at the relevant time.
Conclusion: Smt. Kessarbai was not entitled to one-half share. She had one-third share at the moment of Mohanlal's death.
Final Conclusion: The reference was answered against the accountable person, and the estate duty consequence was confined to the deceased's two-thirds share in the property.
Ratio Decidendi: In a joint Hindu family after partition, the share passing on the death of the deceased for estate duty purposes is confined to the deceased's own share as determined by the wife's vested interest, and not an assumed one-half share merely because the deceased remained in possession of the property.