Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Appeal challenging 'good will' expenditure assessment for AY 2011-12 dismissed by ITAT The ITAT upheld the revision order passed by Ld Pr. CIT, dismissing the appeal filed by the assessee challenging the assessment of expenditure claimed as ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Appeal challenging "good will" expenditure assessment for AY 2011-12 dismissed by ITAT
The ITAT upheld the revision order passed by Ld Pr. CIT, dismissing the appeal filed by the assessee challenging the assessment of expenditure claimed as "good will" for AY 2011-12. The ITAT found the assessment order to be erroneous as the AO had not investigated the claim, and determined it to be prejudicial to the interests of revenue. Therefore, the revision order was deemed valid, and the appeal was rejected.
Issues: Appeal challenging revision order u/s 263 for AY 2011-12 on expenditure claimed as "good will".
Analysis: The assessee appealed against the revision order passed by Ld Pr. CIT, challenging the assessment of expenditure claimed as "good will". The Ld A.R contended that the amount paid to the outgoing distributor was for expanding the existing business, not for acquiring goodwill. The Ld A.R argued that if the claim was disallowed, the assessee would be entitled to depreciation on the full amount, resulting in lower total income. On the other hand, the Ld D.R argued that since the amount was capital expenditure, it couldn't be allowed as a deduction. The Ld CIT-DR stated that the revision order merely directed the AO to examine the claim according to the law.
The ITAT Bangalore examined the legal position regarding the power of the CIT to invoke revision proceedings under section 263 of the Act. Referring to the case law, the ITAT emphasized that for the revision order to be valid, the assessment order must be both erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of revenue. In this case, it was noted that the AO had not investigated the "good will" claim, rendering the order erroneous. The ITAT rejected the assessee's argument that the order was not prejudicial to revenue due to potential depreciation benefits, as this claim did not arise from the assessment order.
Consequently, the ITAT upheld the revision order passed by Ld Pr. CIT, dismissing the appeal filed by the assessee. The decision was pronounced in the Open Court on 27th September 2019.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful) ✕
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter. 
of 
TaxTMI 
