Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the State Government had power under the U.P. Excise Act, 1910 and Article 47 of the Constitution of India to regulate the transport, possession and consumption of Ayurvedic preparations containing alcohol.
Analysis: The challenge concerned notifications and rules treating the preparations as liquor for limited excise purposes and regulating their sale, possession and consumption. The reasoning rejected the view that prohibition under Article 47 could not extend to medicinal preparations containing alcohol. It was held that Article 47, which directs the State to bring about prohibition of intoxicating drinks except for medicinal purposes, does not exclude regulatory control over medicinal preparations that contain a substantial percentage of alcohol and may be misused as ordinary alcoholic beverages. On that basis, the State was viewed as having power to regulate possession and consumption in aid of prohibition and public health.
Conclusion: The State was held to have power to regulate the possession and consumption of such medicinal preparations containing alcohol under the excise law.