Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2018 (8) TMI 1938 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Land classified as long-term capital asset, surplus sale gains treated as long-term capital gain. Indexation benefits granted. The Tribunal classified the land as a long-term capital asset, determining the surplus from its sale as long-term capital gain. The assessee was granted ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            Land classified as long-term capital asset, surplus sale gains treated as long-term capital gain. Indexation benefits granted.

                            The Tribunal classified the land as a long-term capital asset, determining the surplus from its sale as long-term capital gain. The assessee was granted indexation benefits and allowed to set off brought forward long-term capital loss. The appeal was allowed, directing the AO to adjust per the Tribunal's decision, pronounced on 31-08-2018.




                            Issues Involved:
                            1. Classification of the impugned land as a business asset or capital asset.
                            2. Treatment of surplus from the sale of land as business income or long-term capital gain.
                            3. Determination of the holding period of the asset.
                            4. Eligibility for indexation of the cost of the capital asset.
                            5. Entitlement to set off brought forward long-term capital loss against the long-term capital gain.

                            Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

                            1. Classification of the Impugned Land:
                            The primary issue was whether the land sold by the assessee should be classified as a business asset or a capital asset. The assessee initially purchased the land on 03.12.2005 and held it as a capital asset until 01.04.2008, when it was converted into stock-in-trade. On 01.04.2010, the land was re-converted into a capital asset before being sold on 16.09.2010. The assessee contended that the land should be treated as a capital asset based on the entries in the books of accounts, which are considered evidence under the Evidence Act 1872. The Tribunal agreed with the assessee, noting that the land was consistently shown as a capital asset in the balance sheets and wealth tax returns for the relevant years.

                            2. Treatment of Surplus from Sale:
                            The assessee reported the surplus from the sale of the land as a long-term capital gain. However, the AO treated it as business income. The Tribunal found that the land was held as a capital asset for significant periods and that the conversion to stock-in-trade and back to a capital asset was genuine. The Tribunal emphasized that the holding period, rather than the nature of the title, determines the classification of the asset. Consequently, the surplus was to be treated as long-term capital gain.

                            3. Determination of the Holding Period:
                            The holding period of the asset was crucial in determining whether the gain was short-term or long-term. The Tribunal noted that the land was held from 03.12.2005 to 16.09.2010, exceeding the 36-month threshold for long-term capital assets under Section 2(42A) of the Act. The Tribunal held that the holding period should consider the entire duration the asset was held, regardless of its classification as a capital asset or stock-in-trade at different times.

                            4. Eligibility for Indexation:
                            The AO denied the benefit of indexation, arguing that the asset was treated as stock-in-trade. The Tribunal disagreed, stating that there is no provision in the Act that denies indexation even if the asset is considered a business asset at some point. The Tribunal directed the AO to allow the indexation benefit after verifying the records.

                            5. Entitlement to Set Off Brought Forward Long-Term Capital Loss:
                            The assessee claimed a set-off of brought forward long-term capital loss against the long-term capital gain from the sale of the land. The AO rejected this claim, treating the surplus as business income. The Tribunal, however, held that since the surplus was to be treated as long-term capital gain, the assessee was entitled to set off the brought forward long-term capital loss of Rs. 16,40,564. The Tribunal directed the AO to allow this set-off accordingly.

                            Conclusion:
                            The Tribunal concluded that the land should be treated as a long-term capital asset, and the surplus from its sale should be taxed as long-term capital gain. The assessee was entitled to the benefits of indexation and the set-off of brought forward long-term capital loss. The appeal of the assessee was allowed, and the AO was directed to make necessary adjustments in accordance with the Tribunal's findings. The order was pronounced in the open court on 31-08-2018.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found