Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether conversion of leasehold rights into freehold rights, followed by sale within a few days, changed the character of the capital asset so as to make the gain short-term instead of long-term.
Analysis: The period for which the asset was held is the governing test for distinguishing a short-term capital asset from a long-term capital asset. Conversion of leasehold rights into freehold rights merely improves the title already held by the assessee and does not create a fresh period of holding from the date of conversion. The assessee had held the property in substance since the original leasehold acquisition, and the later conversion did not alter the character of the holding for capital gains purposes.
Conclusion: The gain was not to be treated as short-term merely because the property was converted into freehold shortly before sale; the issue was decided against the Revenue and in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The appeal failed because the sale was taxable on the basis of the original holding period, and the conversion into freehold did not reset the period of ownership for capital gains classification.
Ratio Decidendi: Conversion of leasehold rights into freehold rights is only an improvement of title and does not interrupt or restart the period of holding for the purpose of determining whether capital gains are short-term or long-term.