Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether payments made for purchase of software from non-residents were liable to tax deduction at source as royalty or income chargeable to tax in India, and whether the assessee could avoid liability under sections 195 and 201 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 without obtaining a certificate.
Analysis: The Court followed its earlier decision in connected matters and applied the same reasoning to hold that the amounts paid for software were exigible to tax at source. It treated the question of chargeability and the characterization of the payment under section 9 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, read with the relevant treaty provisions, as having been answered against the assessee in the earlier binding decision. On that basis, the failure to deduct tax attracted the consequences under section 201(1) and section 201(1A) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Conclusion: The questions of law were answered in favour of the Revenue and against the assessee, and the Tribunal's order was set aside.