Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether rent paid in advance to the original landlord under a registered rent note, before transfer of the property, operated as a valid discharge against the transferee landlord under Section 50 of the Transfer of Property Act.
Analysis: The advance amount was expressly paid as rent under the registered tenancy document and not as a mere loan. The transferee had notice of the tenancy arrangement and could not deny the effect of the payment made towards rent for the relevant period. The view that advance payment could not amount to discharge was rejected, as the facts were distinguishable from cases where the payment was not treated as rent under the lease itself.
Conclusion: The advance rent payment was a valid discharge, and the tenant was not liable to pay the same rent again to the transferee landlord.
Final Conclusion: The petition succeeded, the appellate decree against the tenant on arrears of rent was set aside, and the trial court decree was restored.
Ratio Decidendi: Where rent is expressly paid in advance as rent under a registered tenancy arrangement before transfer of the property, the payment operates as a valid discharge against the transferee landlord under Section 50 of the Transfer of Property Act.