TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal Orders Revised Offer Price with Interest Due to Calculation Errors</h1> <h3>Pawan Kumar Saraf Versus Securities and Exchange Board of India, Mumbai, Xchanging Technology Services India Private Limited, New Delhi, Computer Sciences Corporation India Private Limited, Chennai, DXC Technology Company, USA, JM Financial Institutional Securities Limited, Mumbai.</h3> Pawan Kumar Saraf Versus Securities and Exchange Board of India, Mumbai, Xchanging Technology Services India Private Limited, New Delhi, Computer Sciences ... Issues: Calculation of offer price under Takeover Regulations, 2011; Applicability of amended definition of 'frequently traded shares'; Timeliness of public announcement by acquirer; SEBI's consideration of objections raised by appellant.Calculation of Offer Price: The appellant sought to quash SEBI's order directing the acquirer and other respondents to revise the offer price from Rs. 55.22 per share to Rs. 79.58 per share along with interest. The appellant contended that the offer price was erroneously calculated, contrary to Takeover Regulations, 2011, and detrimental to public shareholders' interests. The Tribunal noted the discrepancy in the offer price calculation and the need to determine whether the amended definition of 'frequently traded shares' or the old definition should apply. The Tribunal highlighted the importance of considering the date for fixing the offer price, whether on the date of public announcement or the date of the Merger Agreement.Applicability of Amended Definition: The Tribunal emphasized the need for an authority to decide whether the amended definition of Regulation 2(1)(j) or the old definition should be applied in calculating the offer price. The Tribunal refrained from making a decision on this issue due to the lack of consideration by the relevant authority. The Tribunal also highlighted the appellant's communication with SEBI regarding the calculation of the offer price based on the unamended definition of frequently traded shares, indicating SEBI's failure to address these objections in finalizing the offer price.Timeliness of Public Announcement: The appellant raised concerns about the acquirer's delay in making the public announcement, which was made 18 months after the stipulated period following the Merger Agreement. The Tribunal acknowledged the importance of determining the date for fixing the offer price concerning the timing of the public announcement and the Merger Agreement.SEBI's Consideration of Objections: The Tribunal directed the appellant to file a consolidated representation, including the earlier emails sent to SEBI, within four weeks. SEBI was instructed to decide on the representation by a reasoned order after hearing all concerned parties within three months from the date of filing the representation along with a certified copy of the Tribunal's order. This decision aimed to ensure SEBI's proper consideration of the objections raised by the appellant regarding the offer price calculation.
TaxTMI 