Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Section 14-B of the Bombay Abkari Act, as amended, was within the Provincial Legislature's competence notwithstanding its effect on foreign liquor imported across customs frontiers.
Analysis: The provision was examined in the light of the distribution of legislative powers under the Government of India Act, 1935. Item 31 of List II conferred wide power over intoxicating liquor, including possession, while Item 19 of List I dealt with import and export across customs frontiers. The impugned provision regulated possession of intoxicating liquor and did not, in its true nature, enact a law on import or export. Any effect on imports or customs revenue was only incidental. The principle of pith and substance governed validity, and incidental encroachment on a Federal subject did not invalidate a law that substantially fell within a Provincial field. The extent of invasion could not be used to test validity by degrees.
Conclusion: Section 14-B, as amended, was valid and the challenge to Provincial legislative competence failed.
Final Conclusion: The conviction was left undisturbed because the Provincial law was upheld as a valid exercise of legislative power over intoxicating liquor.
Ratio Decidendi: A law is valid if, in pith and substance, it falls within the legislative field assigned to the enacting legislature, and incidental encroachment on another field does not invalidate it.