Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the trustees could be treated as dealers in shares for the assessment year 1955-56.
Analysis: The trustees had been empowered by the will to realise the properties and vary the investments in the interests of the trust. The material showed only occasional variations in a few blocks of shares, and the mere fact that some shares were sold within about three years of purchase was not enough to establish trading activity. The circumstances relied upon by the revenue, including the beneficiary's own share dealings, were considered inconclusive and did not compel an inference that the trustees purchased or sold shares with an intention to make profit by way of business.
Conclusion: The trustees could not be treated as dealers in shares, and the surplus was not taxable as business income.
Final Conclusion: The reference was answered against the revenue on the ground that the Tribunal's finding involved no error of law and the surplus was capital gain rather than trading profit.
Ratio Decidendi: Whether share transactions by trustees amount to trading depends on the facts and surrounding circumstances, and mere frequency or periodic realisation of investments does not by itself establish dealing in shares or an intention to earn business profit.