Tribunal allows depreciation on intangible assets incl. goodwill & customer lists, citing legal provisions

The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the assessee's claim for depreciation on intangible assets, including goodwill and customer lists. The decision was based on the interpretation of relevant legal provisions and precedents, recognizing goodwill and customer lists as falling under the definition of intangible assets. The Tribunal emphasized the legislative intent supporting such claims and overturned the disallowance made by the lower authorities, allowing the assessee to claim depreciation on goodwill for the assessment years in question.

---

---

Issues:
Claim of depreciation on intangible assets - Goodwill/Customer list

Analysis:
The case involved an appeal against the orders of the Commissioner of Income Tax related to the claim of depreciation on intangible assets, specifically goodwill and customer lists, by the assessee, a company providing pest control services. The Assessing Officer disallowed the depreciation claimed by the assessee, contending that the purchase price paid was a non-compete fee and not goodwill or customer right. The assessee relied on Accounting Standard 26 and the decision in CIT Vs Smifs Securities Ltd to support its claim. The lower authorities upheld the disallowance, leading to the appeal.

The Tribunal considered the arguments presented by both parties and referred to a similar case where depreciation on intangible assets was allowed. The Tribunal analyzed the provisions of Section 32(1) Explanation-3, recognizing intangible assets like goodwill and customer lists as falling under the definition. It cited a judgment of the Madras High Court and a decision by the Pune 'A' Bench of the Tribunal to support the inclusion of customer lists as business or commercial rights of a similar nature. The Tribunal concluded that the assessee was entitled to claim depreciation on goodwill/customer list as per the provisions of the Act, emphasizing that the legislative intent supported such claims. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the appeal related to depreciation on goodwill for the assessment years in question.

In summary, the Tribunal's decision favored the assessee's claim for depreciation on intangible assets, specifically goodwill and customer lists, based on the interpretation of relevant legal provisions and precedents. The Tribunal emphasized the broad definition of intangible assets under the Act and upheld the assessee's entitlement to claim depreciation on the said assets, overturning the disallowance made by the lower authorities.

---