Tribunal allows deletion of disallowed bank guarantee commission & CSR expenses.

The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, directing the deletion of disallowances of bank guarantee commission and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) expenses. The appeal was allowed, and the impugned additions were ordered to be deleted.

---

---

Issues:
1. Disallowance of bank guarantee commission as commission u/s 194H and non-deduction of TDS.
2. Disallowance of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) expenses under section 37(1).

Analysis:
1. The first issue pertains to the disallowance of bank guarantee commission as commission u/s 194H and non-deduction of TDS. The appellant contended that the bank guarantee commission should not be considered as commission under Section 194H. The Tribunal referred to a similar case and held that there is no principal-agent relationship between the bank issuing the guarantee and the assessee. The Tribunal concluded that since there is no principal-agent relationship, the disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) for bank guarantee commission was not justified. Therefore, the Tribunal directed the deletion of this disallowance in favor of the assessee.

2. The second issue involves the disallowance of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) expenses under section 37(1). The appellant argued that the CSR expenses were incurred as per government directions and should be allowed as revenue expenditure. The Tribunal referred to a case where CSR expenses were allowed for a previous assessment year and held that prior to a specific date, CSR expenses are revenue in nature and allowable. The Tribunal reviewed the details of the CSR expenditure incurred by the assessee and found that the expenses were legitimate and incurred for various social causes. The Tribunal disagreed with the lower authorities' view that the expenses were not wholly or exclusively for business purposes. Therefore, the Tribunal set aside the disallowance of CSR expenses and directed the Assessing Officer to allow these expenses as revenue expenditure.

In conclusion, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee on both issues, directing the deletion of the disallowances of bank guarantee commission and CSR expenses. The appeal by the assessee was allowed, and the impugned additions were ordered to be deleted.

---