ITAT rules in favor of assessee on multiple issues including bank guarantee commission & CSR expenses

The ITAT ruled in favor of the assessee in all issues presented. It held that bank guarantee commission is not subject to TDS deduction under section 40(a)(ia), allowed CSR expenses as revenue expenditure pre-1.4.2013, permitted provision for long service award on actuarial basis, and approved additional depreciation for electricity as movable property. The tribunal emphasized the legitimacy of the expenses and deductions, providing detailed reasoning and referencing legal precedents.

---

---

Issues:
1. Disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act
2. Disallowance of expenses on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)
3. Disallowance of provision for long service award made on actuarial basis
4. Disallowance of additional depreciation

Issue 1: Disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act:
The assessee appealed against the disallowance of bank guarantee commission under section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act. The ITAT Delhi Bench ruled in favor of the assessee, citing precedents that bank guarantee commission does not fall under the purview of section 194H for TDS deduction. The tribunal held that there is no principal-agent relationship between the bank and the assessee in such transactions, leading to the deletion of the disallowance.

Issue 2: Disallowance of expenses on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR):
The appeal challenged the disallowance of CSR expenses by the assessing officer and confirmed by the CIT (A). The ITAT held that prior to 1.4.2013, CSR expenses are revenue in nature and allowable. The tribunal examined the nature of CSR expenses incurred by the assessee and concluded that these expenses were valid and allowable as revenue expenditure, irrespective of being voluntary, as there was no disabling provision for such expenses before 1.4.2015. The order directed the AO to allow the CSR expenses incurred by the assessee.

Issue 3: Disallowance of provision for long service award made on actuarial basis:
The department appealed against the deletion of provision for long service award made on an actuarial basis. The ITAT upheld the deletion, stating that the liability determined on the basis of provision was definite and ascertained, making it allowable under the provisions of the Act. The tribunal referred to previous judgments and held that the provision for long service award was legitimate and allowable under both normal provisions and MAT.

Issue 4: Disallowance of additional depreciation:
The department's appeal challenged the deletion of disallowance of additional depreciation. The ITAT supported the deletion, citing that electricity falls under the definition of goods and additional depreciation cannot be denied based on the intangibility of electricity. The tribunal upheld the decision of the CIT (A) to delete the disallowance, emphasizing that electricity is movable property and thus eligible for additional depreciation.

In conclusion, the ITAT allowed the appeal of the assessee while dismissing the department's appeal, providing detailed reasoning for each issue and referring to relevant legal precedents and judgments.

---