TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Supreme Court Upholds Explanation to Section 17 of Market Law, Allows Mandi Demands</h1> <h3>Krishi Utpadan Mandi Samiti And Others Versus Shree Mahalaxmi Sugar Works And Others</h3> The Supreme Court upheld the Explanation to Section 17 of the Uttar Pradesh Krishi Utpadan Mandi Adhiniyam, 1964, allowing demands by the Krishi Utpadan ... - The Supreme Court granted leave in a case involving the Uttar Pradesh Krishi Utpadan Mandi Adhiniyam, 1964. The Explanation to Section 17 creates a presumption against dealers, allowing demands to be raised by the Krishi Utpadan Mandi Samiti. Dealers must pay market fees unless they can prove the sale did not occur within the market area. The appeals were disposed of accordingly.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
