<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (2) TMI 470 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284046</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the Explanation to Section 17 of the Uttar Pradesh Krishi Utpadan Mandi Adhiniyam, 1964, allowing demands by the Krishi Utpadan Mandi Samiti against dealers unless they can prove sales occurred outside the market area. The appeals were disposed of in line with this interpretation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Oct 2019 15:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=592044" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (2) TMI 470 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284046</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the Explanation to Section 17 of the Uttar Pradesh Krishi Utpadan Mandi Adhiniyam, 1964, allowing demands by the Krishi Utpadan Mandi Samiti against dealers unless they can prove sales occurred outside the market area. The appeals were disposed of in line with this interpretation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284046</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>