Tribunal Upholds Financial Creditor's Petition Against Corporate Debtor

The Tribunal admitted the Company Petition under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, filed by the Petitioner, a Financial Creditor, against the Corporate Debtor. Despite the Corporate Debtor's defense of being time-barred, the Tribunal found the debt within the limitation period. The Petitioner's claim was supported by evidence of debt existence and default, leading to the appointment of an Interim Resolution Professional and declaration of a moratorium under Section 14 of the I&B Code. Consequential directions were issued to maintain the moratorium's effect until the resolution process's completion or liquidation approval, with compliance communication directed to relevant parties.

---

---

Issues:
1. Initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process under Section 7 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
2. Assignment of debt by original lender to the Petitioner.
3. Existence of debt, default, and security interest.
4. Barred by Limitation defense raised by the Corporate Debtor.
5. Appointment of Interim Resolution Professional and declaration of moratorium under Section 14 of I&B Code.

Analysis:
1. The Company Petition was filed under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 by the Petitioner, a Financial Creditor, seeking initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process against the Corporate Debtor. The Petition was based on the debt assigned by the original lender, UCO Bank, to the Petitioner through a Deed of Assignment.

2. The Petitioner established the existence of debt through various instruments and agreements, including the Master Restructuring Agreement and security creation documents. The Corporate Debtor's default was evidenced by the CIBIL report, UCO Bank's entries, and the Corporate Debtor's acknowledgment of the debt through settlement offers.

3. The Corporate Debtor raised a defense of being time-barred due to the Limitation Act, claiming the Petition was filed after five years from the date of default. However, the Tribunal found that the debt was within the limitation period as proceedings were initiated before the Debt Recovery Tribunal, and the claim was not time-barred.

4. In light of the established debt and default of more than one Lakh Rupees by the Corporate Debtor, the Tribunal admitted the Petition under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The Petitioner's proposal for an Interim Resolution Professional was accepted, and a moratorium under Section 14 of the I&B Code was declared.

5. The Tribunal issued consequential directions under the moratorium, including prohibiting suits against the Corporate Debtor, restricting asset disposal, and ensuring the supply of essential goods or services. The appointment of the Interim Resolution Professional was confirmed, and the moratorium's effect was specified until the resolution process's completion or liquidation approval. Compliance communication was directed to all relevant parties promptly.

---