Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether an industrial dispute can come into existence without a formal written demand by the workman and whether a reference under Section 10(1) was incompetent for want of such demand.
Analysis: Under Section 2(k) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, an industrial dispute arises when there is a real dispute or difference connected with employment or non-employment, and the Act does not require that it must be created in any prescribed form. A written demand is not a condition precedent, except where the statute expressly so provides. The existence of the dispute and the need for reference under Section 10(1) are matters for the appropriate Government to assess administratively. On the record, the workman had persistently sought reinstatement through the disciplinary process, the appellate challenge, and the conciliation proceedings, showing an existing dispute.
Conclusion: The reference was valid and the Tribunal was wrong in treating it as incompetent for want of a formal demand.
Final Conclusion: The award rejecting the dispute was set aside and the matter was sent back to the Tribunal for decision according to law.
Ratio Decidendi: An industrial dispute may exist without a written demand, and a reference under Section 10(1) cannot be invalidated merely because the Tribunal thinks the Government lacked material, so long as a real dispute connected with employment in fact existed.