Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the respondent was entitled to be considered for the post of lecturer in Geography despite not having the prescribed qualification and having failed to disclose her earlier appearance and failure in the relevant examination.
Analysis: The prescribed recruitment criteria required a master's degree in the relevant subject, a good academic record, and qualification in the comprehensive test prescribed by the University Grants Commission or the Government of Punjab. The respondent relied on a qualification in a related subject, but that was not the required qualification for recruitment to the post. It was also found that she had previously appeared in the examination conducted for recruitment of lecturers in Geography and had failed, a which she did not disclose before the High Court. The nondisclosure was material to her claim for relief.
Conclusion: The respondent was not entitled to the relief sought and the writ petition was liable to be dismissed.