1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Petitioner's Payment to Defaulter Adjusted, Order Quashed, Respondents Must Prove Debt</h1> The High Court of Madras ruled that the petitioner's payment to a defaulter should be adjusted against the amount owed, quashing the order to pay the full ... - The High Court of Madras quashed an order directing the petitioner to pay Rs. 19,83,176 to a defaulter, Sivananda Steels Ltd. The court ruled that the amount payable by the petitioner to the defaulter should be adjusted against the amount the defaulter owes, and the petitioner cannot be directed to pay the full amount demanded by the respondents. The impugned order was set aside, and the respondents were given liberty to proceed against the money if they can prove the petitioner owes it to the defaulter.