Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether time could be extended for the auction purchaser to deposit the amount required for engrossing the sale certificate with non-judicial stamps, after the statutory period under Order XXI, Rule 85 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 had expired.
Analysis: The statutory obligation under Order XXI, Rule 85 is mandatory and requires the purchaser to pay the full purchase money within the prescribed time, including the amount necessary for non-judicial stamps for the sale certificate. Once the auction purchaser had engaged counsel and sought confirmation of sale, there was no basis to invoke the Court's discretionary powers under Section 148 or Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 to enlarge time. The settled legal position, as reflected in the relied upon authorities, is that failure to comply with the mandatory deposit requirement renders the sale invalid and no extension can be granted on grounds of equity or bona fides.
Conclusion: Time could not be extended. The order permitting late deposit was unsustainable, and the revision was liable to be allowed.