Tribunal denies tax deduction for "pan masala" manufacturing under Section 80IC due to product categorization.

The tribunal upheld the Assessing Officer's decision to disallow the Section 80IC deduction claim for manufacturing "pan masala" due to its inclusion in the negative list of the Thirteenth Schedule. The appellant's activities were deemed as manufacturing, but the product's categorization under the Income Tax Act rendered it ineligible for the deduction. The tribunal emphasized strict interpretation of exemption provisions, leading to the denial of the deduction claim for the lead assessment year 2007-08 and subsequent years.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Validity of reopening the assessment under Section 148.
2. Eligibility of Section 80IC deduction for the manufacturing of "pan masala".
3. Whether the activity of the assessee constitutes "manufacture" under Section 80IC.
4. Applicability of the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Schedules of the Income Tax Act concerning the negative and positive lists of articles or things.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Validity of Reopening the Assessment under Section 148:
The Assessing Officer issued a notice under Section 148 on 03.03.2014, believing that the taxpayer's business activity did not amount to manufacture or production under Section 80IC(2), leading to the escapement of taxable income. The assessee's objections to the reopening were declined, as the Assessing Officer found sufficient grounds, including failure to file returns within the stipulated time, issuance of Section 142(1) notice, and inconsistencies in raw material consumption and sales.

2. Eligibility of Section 80IC Deduction for the Manufacturing of "Pan Masala":
The Revenue's primary grievance was the CIT(A)'s reversal of the assessment findings, which disallowed the assessee's Section 80IC deduction claims. The CIT(A) concluded that since the appellant started manufacturing "pan masala" from 2006, it was eligible for the exemption before "pan masala" was shifted to the negative list effective 01.04.2007. The CIT(A) found the appellant's registrations with various departments and affidavits from Gazetted Officers confirming its manufacturing activities as valid evidence.

3. Whether the Activity of the Assessee Constitutes "Manufacture" under Section 80IC:
The CIT(A) and the tribunal relied on the Supreme Court's decision in Arihant Tiles & Marbles Pvt. Ltd., which held that activities recognized by various government authorities as manufacturing should be considered as such under Section 80IA. The tribunal noted that the assessee was registered under central excise, VAT, and other relevant departments, and had been recognized as a manufacturer by the Ministry of Finance. The tribunal also referred to the case of DCIT vs. M/s Khushbu Industries, where similar activities were deemed manufacturing.

4. Applicability of the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Schedules of the Income Tax Act:
The tribunal examined whether "pan masala" fell under the positive list of the Fourteenth Schedule or the negative list of the Thirteenth Schedule. The Assessing Officer argued that "pan masala" was excluded from the positive list and included in the negative list of tobacco products. The tribunal agreed, noting that "pan masala" was explicitly listed under tobacco products in Part-B of the Thirteenth Schedule and thus was not eligible for Section 80IC deduction. The tribunal emphasized the principle of strict interpretation of exemption provisions, as upheld by the Supreme Court in Commissioner of Customs vs. Dilip Kumar Roy.

Conclusion:
The tribunal restored the Assessing Officer's action, disallowing the Section 80IC deduction claim of Rs. 436,98,608/- for the lead assessment year 2007-08, and similarly for the subsequent years. The Revenue's appeals were allowed, concluding that "pan masala" is included in the negative list of the Thirteenth Schedule and not eligible for the deduction under Section 80IC.

---