Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a conveyance seized in connection with an NDPS case could be released on superdari pending trial under Section 451 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 despite the confiscation scheme under Sections 60(3) and 63 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985.
Analysis: Sections 60(3) and 63 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 provide for confiscation of a conveyance used for carrying narcotic drugs after notice and consideration of the claim of the person asserting rights over it, and the confiscation decision is to be made at the end of the trial. Section 51 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 makes the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 applicable where it is not inconsistent with the Act. Section 451 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 authorises a criminal court to make orders for proper custody of property pending inquiry or trial, and that provision was held not to be inconsistent with the special Act in relation to interim custody of the conveyance. As the petitioner was the registered owner and the vehicle was likely to suffer damage by remaining unused, interim release was warranted.
Conclusion: The conveyance could be released on superdari pending trial under Section 451 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, and the order refusing release was unsustainable.